Creating a plot of your first story by example

Article
G
In progress
7
Fandom:
Size:
planned Midi, written 3 pages, 1,415 words, 1 chapter
Description:
Publishing on other websites:
Check with the author / translator
7 Like 3 Comments 0 To the collection

Creating Your First Story: From Turbulent Sketches to a Solid Foundation

Settings
As a budding author with a passion for realistic and well-thought-out plots, I spent countless hours staring at a blank page. But I discovered that true magic lies not only in inspiration, but also in structure. Eleven years ago, when I embarked on my first major novel—a sprawling tale of four main characters connected by a shared location—I faced several obstacles that nearly derailed the entire project. Firstly, my characters were older, wiser, and more experienced than I was. Secondly, I was extremely fascinated by language play, the beauty of syllables, and I could rewrite one paragraph of the first draft 15 times. At the time, I was reading a lot of classics, and my style was heavy—I still have some old habits that are difficult to break. The main one is that I tend to tell rather than show. Thirdly, I became very interested in the three-act structure, and I created detailed stage directions and arcs for each of my characters. Moreover, I had written every scene that I had planned. And I couldn't finish the story because they didn't fit together—my characters were shouting over each other, overshadowing each other's stories, and there wasn't any central idea to hold them together. The first chapters were easy to read because I was familiar with the characters. The ending was vivid in my mind, a climactic battle that tied everything together. But the middle? Oh, the terrible middle. It was a real quagmire: the plot dragged on, the subplots seemed incoherent, and my once-attractive characters fell into repetitive conflicts without any clear development. The pages were piling up, but the momentum was fading. The characters were wandering aimlessly, and I found myself staring at a story that promised an exciting plot but delivered boredom. Since my first failure, I had become convinced that long-form novels weren't for me, and that my true calling was writing fanfiction rather than attempting to create original works. For some consecutive years, I had been successful in writing short stories, poems, and small, completed fanfictions. Then, by the time I was in my senior year of university, I started writing short stories, but as soon as I got to the tenth scene, I would get stuck in the middle of the story. Desperate for guidance, I turned to a set of storytelling techniques that not only saved my only completed draft, but also became the foundation of my writing process. This is a very complex and global story, and I don't think I will ever be able to translate it into English. But nevertheless, today I want to share how I combine these techniques to plan, draft, and refine stories that captivate readers in all genres. Drawing on John Truby's "The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller," Donald Maass's "The Emotional Craft of Fiction," and Eric Bork's "The Idea: The Seven Elements of a Viable Story for Screen, Stage, or Fiction," I create a foundation for emotionally charged narratives that are rich with ideas. Then, after the first draft, I switch to Stuart Horwitz's "Book Architecture" method to solve these middle challenges—creating unity without compromising creativity. This approach has transformed my writing from chaotic experimentation into a deliberate craft. In this article, I will explain each method step by step, illustrate how they interact, and discuss the "middle muddle" challenge I faced and how I overcame it. At the end, you'll have a practical roadmap, including a personal example from my new coming-of-age novel, which I'll plan right in front of you. Let's dive into the methods, and I'll briefly introduce you to my favorite books on screenwriting and editing. John Truby's "The Anatomy of Story" is my guiding light in narrative architecture. Unlike formulaic structures that prioritize plot beats (such as the Hero's Journey), Truby emphasizes the psychological and moral spine of storytelling. At its core is the idea that great stories revolve around characters with deeply flawed desires who find themselves in situations that force them to confront these flaws, overcoming opposition and revelations. John Truby's framework introduces key elements that form the backbone of a compelling story: the hero's desire, which can be divided into an external want—like becoming rich—and an internal need, such as overcoming self-doubt through self-discovery; opponents and allies, who go beyond simple villains to include complex forces that challenge the hero's growth; the ghost, or backstory, representing psychological baggage that explains the hero's motives; design, the overarching plot strategy that ensures twists develop organically from character choices rather than relying on a deus ex machina; and themes, the moral lessons embedded in the narrative. In my novel, Truby helped outline the arcs, but without additions, the middles still sagged due to reliance on setup. I needed more for emotional resonance and creative inspiration. Then is time for Donald Maass's "The Emotional Craft of Fiction," which focuses on the heart of conflict. While Truby builds the framework, Maass infuses the reader with vitality, making them feel the stakes through heightened emotions. He argues that stories succeed by pushing characters to emotional extremes: love, rage, despair, and joy that resonate universally. Donald Maass's approach to storytelling incorporates several core principles that deepen emotional engagement: the emotional line of tension, which escalates the hero's emotional journey in parallel with the plot to steer clear of flat arcs; micro- and macro-emotions, involving the detailed portrayal of small, intimate moments, like a character's tearful realization, set against the backdrop of larger crises; breaking hearts and gripping readers through amplified "show, don't tell" techniques that compel characters to make morally ambiguous choices reflecting real-life dilemmas; and the emotional payoff, culminating in resolutions that resonate long after, such as catharsis in a villain's final moments of redemption. In the middle of my novel, this method revealed why the plot dragged: characters weren't evolving emotionally. Scenes felt like checklists rather than evoking despair or hope. Applying Maass's emotional twists breathed new life into the stagnant middle, making subplots feel vital to the protagonists' psyches. Any story needs to settle. In the past, I used to test ideas mentally right from the initial thought stage, sometimes playing with them for months. Now, I use Bork's method to assess an idea's potential based on the first two criteria. But that's not the end of it. Eric Bork's "The Idea: The Seven Elements of a Viable Story for Screen, Stage, or Fiction" is my tool for refining ideas. This book is perfect for those who have a list of scenes, characters, and arcs but no draft yet—a kind of strength test. Bork suggests evaluating your idea (or the problem underlying it) using seven key criteria. Each chapter is devoted to one criterion, with a list of self-checking questions at the end. This approach fueled my novel's concepts, helping me polish concepts into viable stories without clichés. And again, ideas need to mature. The first draft is written and set aside. During this time, I do anything but write—looking for character references, creating them in Sims, searching for locations and time markers—all things that felt out of place in the first draft. It takes at least two weeks, though more is better. Stuart Horwitz's "Story Architecture" transforms a messy pile into a habitable structure. Rejecting rigid outlines, Horwitz promotes architecture as intuitive reconfiguration: identifying core elements, addressing weaknesses, and weaving thematic threads without formulas. In my previous novel, this method allowed me to preserve the ending. After writing the draft, I realized that the emotional escalations from Maass created gaps where little advanced the plot, and the rising conflicts weren't building to completion. I removed unnecessary scenes, made supporting characters more functional, added hooks to the plot, and smoothed out transitions. At this stage, the text is compressed for the second and final draft to reach its full potential. Ahead lie only proofreading and catching glitches—grammatical, factual, and sometimes minor plot fixes. My first finished novel's middle also was a textbook "sagging middle"—after the inciting incident but before the climax. Pacing flagged as subplots interacted superficially, and character growth stalled. But, brawing on all techniques, I tightened the desire arcs from Truby, added emotional stakes from Maass, refined the core idea with Bork, and ensured cohesion via Horwitz. Voila—a story that flows. Combining these methods isn't about following rules, but forging your own path. If you're plotting your tale, experiment with them. In the following sections, I'll guide you through how I build a story from scratch. Ready to start building?
7 Like 3 Comments 0 To the collection
Comments (3)